检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴帆[1] 辛春林[1] 刘斌[1] 陈丽华 Wu Fan;Xin Chunlin;Liu Bin;Chen Lihua(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029)
出 处:《管理评论》2018年第10期248-257,共10页Management Review
基 金:国家社科基金项目(13BGL065)
摘 要:近年来,融资租赁作为企业的一种重要融资手段在中国得到广泛应用。有别于经营租赁,税率差别是企业作为承租人采用融资租赁方式的主要原因之一。本文研究了一类占线融资租赁问题,即设备投资决策者在对未来市场需求一无所知或者有限预知,如何决策采用经营性租赁还是融资租赁?现有文献大多数研究的是占线经营性租买问题。在考虑了税率对融资租赁策略的影响并针对有、无预付保证金情形下,本文分别设计了相应的竞争策略并给出了竞争比。通过算例分析表明:在无预付保证金情形下,占线策略性能随着企业所得税税率的减小而提高;在有预付保证金情形中,占线策略性能随着预付保证金的减少而提高。In recent years, financial leasing has been widely used as an important means of financing in China. Unlike operating leases, difference in corporate tax rate is one of the main reasons why a lessee uses the lease financing. This paper explores the online financial leasing issue to find out how investment decision-makers, who know nothing or little about potential market demand, decide to use operating or financial leasing? Most studies in the existing literature focus on online lease-or-buy issue. Considering the influence of tax rate on financial leasing policies, this paper designs two online financial leasing policies and gives the competitive ratios in two cases: one with down payment and the other without. The result shows that: in the case without down payment involved, online strategy performance improves as the corporate income tax rate decreases; in the case with down payment involved, the performance of online strategy increases while the down payment increases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.213