全程系统性护理干预在下肢深静脉血栓患者中的应用效果  

Application of full range systemic nursing intervention in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs

作　　者：杜映[1] 吴晓玲[1] 杜拥军[2] DU Ying;WU Xiaoling;DU Yongjun(Department of Vascular Surgery;Department of Urinary Surgery,Subei People′s Hospital,Yangzhou,Jiangsu,225001)

机构地区：[1]江苏省苏北人民医院血管外科,江苏扬州225001 [2]江苏省苏北人民医院泌尿外科,江苏扬州225001

出　　处：《实用临床医药杂志》2018年第22期157-159,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice

摘　　要：目的探讨血管外科质量控制(QC)小组在下肢深静脉血栓治疗和随访中的应用效果。方法选取100例下肢深静脉血栓行置管溶栓或单纯抗凝治疗患者,随机分为对照组和实验组各50例。实验组于入院当天、入院1～7 d及出院前1 d实施健康教育路径,对照组实施常规健康教育。比较2组患者护理干预后的舒适度、疾病不确定感和生活质量。结果实验组患者舒适度、对疾病的不确定感、生活质量显著优于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论全程系统性护理干预能促使患者积极参与并配合相关治疗与护理工作,减少相关的并发症,提高护理服务的满意度。Objective To investigate the efficiency of full range systemic nursing in the treatment and follow-up of patients with deep venous thrombosis in department of vascular surgery by quality control （QC） team. Methods A total of 100 deep venous thrombosis patients treated with catheter thrombolysis or simple anticoagulation therapy were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 50 cases in each group. The experimental group was conducted with health education path on the hospital admission, 1 to 7 days in hospital one day before hospital discharge, while the control group was conducted with routine health education. Comfortable degree after the nursing intervention, sense of uncertainty in illness and quality of life were compared between two groups. Results The comfortable degree, sense of uncertainty in illness and quality of life in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group （ P 〈0.05）. Conclusion Full range systematic nursing intervention can promote patients to actively participate in and cooperate with related treatment and nursing work, reduce related complications, and improve the satisfaction degree to nursing services.

关 键 词：全程系统性护理干预 下肢深静脉血栓 质量控制 舒适度 生活质量 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]