《文献通考·经籍考》的整理、著录及其评价  

Collating, Cataloging and Evaluation of Comprehensive Textual Research of Historical Documents · Confucian Classics

作　　者：连凡[1] Lian Fan(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《图书情报研究》2018年第4期86-93,共8页Library and Information Studies

摘　　要：简介马端临及其《文献通考·经籍考》,先对《文献通考》及其《经籍考》的古籍刻本及影印本的情况进行梳理,后对今人点校整理本的情况进行分析,认为其历经《经籍考》单行本(1985)、"传世藏书"中的《文献通考》横排简体点校本(1996)及北京中华书局出版竖排繁体点校本(2011)三个阶段。《文献通考》及其《经籍考》从产生并为书目所著录直到最终在官修书目中确立地位,经历了一个漫长曲折的过程,目前学界对《经籍考》的学术价值及其与历代书目之关系的研究还有待提高。The present article makes a brief description of Ma Duanlin and hisComprehensive Textual Research of Historical Documents · Confucian Classics . It firstsorts out the block-printed editions and photocopies of Comprehensive Textual Researchof Historical Documents and its Confucian Classics and then analyzes their contemporarypunctuated and collated editions. It argues that the book has gone through three stages,i.e. the separate edition of Confucian Classics （1985）, the horizontally-printed checkededition of Comprehensive Textual Research of Historical Documents （1996） in simplifiedChinese characters and the vertically-printed checked edition （2011） in traditional Chinesecharacters. Comprehensive Textual Research of Historical Documents and its ConfucianClassics have undergone a long and tortuous process from their first production to theestablishment of their position in officially-edited catalogue. At present, further research isyet to be made on the academic value of the Confucian Classics and its relationship with thecatalogues of the past dynasties.

关 键 词：《文献通考·经籍考》 马端临 辑录体 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]