检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘平[1] 扈彩霞 LIU Ping;HU Cai-xia(Business School,Qingdao Binhai College,Qingdao 266555,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛滨海学院商学院,山东青岛266555 [2]中国石油大学(华东)文学院,山东青岛266555
出 处:《医学与哲学(A)》2018年第11期60-62,共3页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基 金:2017年青岛市哲学社会科学规划项目(QDSKL1701179);2017年山东省高等学校人文社会科学计划项目(J17RB055)
摘 要:中美两国都有保障不同类型群体的公共医疗保险计划,这些保险计划在保险范围、保费缴付、保险给付等方面不尽相同,基于这些方面运用分类研究法剖析美国不同公共医疗保险计划的特征和具体内容,探索美国公共医保管理重点关注的相关要素和控制点,从整体层面和操作层面梳理美国公共医保控费举措。同时基于当前美国公共医疗保险管理面临的挑战,围绕公共医保资金筹集和医保资金支付这条主线,回应国内医保界的关切,并对比中国社会医疗保险内容,期望发现某些对我国社会医疗保险管理有参考价值的信息。Both United States and China have public health insurance systems, but they vary from the scope of insurance, premium payment to insurance payment, etc. By using the classification method, the authors analyze the different characteristics and specific content of public health insurance plan, and explore the relevant factors and public health management focusing on control points, so as to study the U.S. public health control measures from the overall and operational perspectives. Meanwhile, based on the current U.S. public medical insurance management challenges and focusing on public funding and payment, this paper responds to domestic health concerns and makes a comparison with Chinese social medical insurance, aiming to find some valuable reference and information for improvement of Chinese social medical insurance.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15