检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑峰峰 陈雨霏[1] 王永莉[2] 洪义国[3] 刘卫国[4] 张传伦 Zheng Fengfeng;Chen Yufei;Wang Yongli;Hong Yiguo;Liu Weiguo;Zhang Chuanlun(State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China;School of Environmental Science and Engineer,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China;State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology,Institute of Earth Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi' an 710075,China;Department of Ocean Science and Engineering,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen 518055,China;Laboratory for Marine Geology,Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology,Qingdao 266061,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学海洋地质国家重点实验室,上海200092 [2]中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京100029 [3]广州大学环境科学与工程学院,广东广州510006 [4]中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,陕西西安710075 [5]南方科技大学海洋科学与工程系,广东深圳518055 [6]青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋地质过程与环境功能实验室,山东青岛266061
出 处:《地球科学》2018年第A01期71-83,共13页Earth Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(No.41673073)
摘 要:为深入了解bGDGTs化合物对温度的响应是否受季节性变化和pH差异的影响,我们对中国多个偏碱性土壤bGDGTs化合物进行为期一年的观测.研究结果表明:在一年内,bGDGTs的组成对温度的响应是长期积累的结果,并不能反映短期(季节)的温度变化.寒冷的青藏高原高海拔地区b GDGTs指标可能反映了春季/夏季过渡阶段的温度;而其他区域bGDGTs的分布和指标均未呈现明显的季节性特征.土壤pH是造成不同校正公式斜率差异的最主要原因,不同pH条件下,MBT指标对温度的响应存在显著差异.在中国中性-偏碱性土壤中,MBT指标与年均大气温度MAAT(5~25?C)的关系为:MAAT=20.78×MBT+5.92(R2=0.88, p <0.001).该校正公式在中性-偏碱性土壤环境中比之前的MBT-MAAT校正公式更精确,为反演中国区域古温度提供理论依据.To better understand the seasonal variation of b GDGTs in soils, we collected samples time-serially from several Chinese alkaline soils over 1 year. On the seasonal scale, the composition of b GDGTs is the result of a long-time adaption to temperature variation rather than a short-time adjustment. bGDGTs-derived temperatures in soils from cold and high altitude of Tibet Plateau are likely to reflect the temperature of spring/summer transition period. However, in other sites, the distribution and proxies of bGDGTs don't show significant seasonal variation or bias. Furthermore,soil pH appears to be the main reason for discrepancy in slopes of different calibrations, which can result in distinct calibration formulas in soils.Combining with the previously published datasets, our results demonstrate that the responses of MBT index to temperature are different in alkaline and acidic soils. Here, we propose an MBT-MAAT calibration in neutral to alkaline soils: MAAT = 20.78 × MBT + 5.92(R2 = 0.88, p 0.001)(5-25℃). This calibration partially amends the impact of soil pH on MBT-MAAT relationship, which provides more accurate calibration for paleotemperature reconstruction in specific regions of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117