伊芙·塞奇威克的性别批评理论关键词:同性社会交际  

Homosociality: A Keyword of Sedgwick's Sexuality Criticism

作　　者：徐振[1] Zhen Xu(Lecturer,Humanities College,Xi＇an Technological University,Xi＇an,Shaanxi,China)

机构地区：[1]西安工业大学人文学院,陕西西安710021

出　　处：《外国语言与文化》2018年第3期41-50,共10页Foreign Languages and Cultures

基　　金：西安工业大学校长基金"当代美国文学理论家伊芙.塞奇威克研究"(XAGDXJJ17023)

摘　　要：同性社会交际作为社会学中的概念,本义指向的是相同性别人群的社会关系,其中男性群体所形成的"男性纽带"关系对社会合作的形成具有重要的意义,因为这种纽带关系被认为是人类进化的必然。部分人类学家认为在男权社会中,男性将女性进行了"物化"处理,女性因此成为男性之间交易的物品。塞奇威克在吸纳上述理论资源的同时将同性社会交际纳入其理论建构之中,考察了男性同性社会交际之中的欲望关系,这种欲望被塞奇威克视为是男性社会的驱动力,也是男性的行为动机、身份和情感的终极源头和真相。塞奇维克将同性社会交际欲望引入经典文学批评,其所揭示的同性社会交际欲望在西方文学中几乎是随处可见,塞奇威克的批评颠覆了对大量爱情文本的传统阐释,改变了读者阅读习惯中的惯性思维。Homosocial relates to social relationships between persons of the same sex in the context of sociology. Male bonding was considered to be a necessity of human evolution, which is significant to the formation of social cooperation. Some anthropologists believed that women were materialized and became transactions in the patriarchy society. Sedgwick＇s theoretical system was based on sociology and anthropology; she paid more attention to male homosocial desire, which was viewed as the ultimate source and truth of male motivations, identities, and emotions, the impulse of male society. Sedgwick introduced the homosocial desire into classical literary criticism. The homosocial desire revealed by her is almost everywhere in Western literature. Sedgwick＇s criticism not only transforms conventional interpretations of a number of beloved literary texts, but also begins to chan^e our patterns of reading as well.

关 键 词：伊芙·塞奇威克 性别批评 同性社会交际 男性纽带 

分 类 号：I712[文学—其他各国文学]