假冒类案件的刑事法认定  

Identification of Criminal Liability for Counterfeit Cases

作　　者：李卫红 Li Weihong

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学政法学院,北京100089

出　　处：《法学杂志》2018年第11期107-114,共8页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在假冒类案件办理过程中,实体上关于侵权产品的市场中间价格的认定,在司法实践中有可能产生罪、责、刑不相适应的状况,对此应从两个路径进行解决:一是在司法解释上修改认定犯罪数额的标准,二是法官在对具体案件量刑时,应考虑相关的其他法定与酌定情节,尤其考虑适用大量的酌定情节。在一罪还是数罪的问题上,如果法条竞合,应当以一罪判决,不得重复评价行为人的行为,以体现对行为人的人权保护。关于罚金数额的确定,应当依据犯罪数额来确定,彻底在经济上剥夺犯罪分子的犯罪能力。在具体个案办理中,应当完备搜查时的程序与法律手续,以保证在之后的刑事诉讼中所使用的证据合法有效。如果涉及行刑衔接的问题,前期行政罚款的处罚应尽可能在可能被判处罚金的数额之内确定,以避免后期不必要的麻烦。In the process of handling counterfeit cases,the substantive determination of the market intermediate price of infringing products may lead to the incompatibility of crime,responsibility and punishment in judicial practice. Withal,we should solve them in two ways： in judicial interpretation,the criteria for determining the amount of crime should be revised,and judges should consider relevant statutory and discretionary circumstances when sentencing specific cases,in particular,a large number of applicable discretionary circumstances. On the question of one crime or several crimes,if the law is concurrence,it should be judged by a single crime and no prohibition repeatable evaluation,in order to protection of human rights. As for the determination of the amount of fine,we should judge it according to the amount of crime,so as to strip the criminal’s economic criminal ability completely. In dealing with specific cases,the relevant procedures and legal procedures in search should be completed so that the evidence in the subsequent criminal proceedings can be legitimate and effective. If the connection of criminal cases is involved,the amount of the administrative penalty should be determined as far as possible within the amount of possible fines,so as to avoid unnecessary trouble.

关 键 词：企业产权 市场中间价格 酌定情节 罚金数额 行刑衔接 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]