检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈小英[1] 张志健 Chen Xiaoying;Zhang Zhijian(School of Physical Education Guangzhou University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510006)
机构地区:[1]广州大学体育学院,广东广州510006 [2]广州体育学院研究生院,广东广州510500
出 处:《安徽体育科技》2018年第5期44-48,共5页Journal of Anhui Sports Science
摘 要:通过运用秩和比法,对CBA联赛2017—2018赛季总决赛浙江队和辽宁队的攻防能力进行客观评价分析。其结果表明:主要体现在辽宁队的身体数据均值比广厦队要好。在进攻方面,辽宁队属于A级水平,广厦队属于B级水平,辽宁队的进攻能力要高于广厦队。在防守方面,辽宁队属于A级水平,广厦队属于C级水平,辽宁队的防守能力要远高于广厦队。在攻防能力方面,辽宁队属于A级水平,广厦队属于C级水平,辽宁队的攻防能力要远高于广厦队。By using the rank sum ratio method,this paper makes an objective evaluation and analysis on the offensive and defensive abilities of Zhejiang and Liaoning teams in the final of the CBA league in the 2017-2018 season. The results show that: Liaoning's physical data average is better than Guangxia team. In offensive aspect,Liaoning belongs to A level,Guangdong team belongs to B level,Liaoning's offensive ability is higher than Guangxia team. In defense,Liaoning belongs to A level,Guangxia belongs to C level,Liaoning ' s defensive ability is much higher than Guangxia team. In terms of offensive and defensive capability,Liaoning belongs to A level,Guangxia team to C level,Liaoning team has far higher offensive and defense capability than the Guangxia team.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28