客观归责与传统因果关系理论运用评析——以具体案例为视角  

An Analysis of the Application of Objective Imputation and Traditional Causality Theory——From the Perspective of Specific Cases

作　　者：周维康 ZHOU Wei-kang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200050

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2018年第5期70-75,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：我国传统因果关系理论有三大类,其中必然因果关系和偶然因果关系说是我国的通说,传统因果关系理论存在不当扩大或不当缩小因果关系范围、判断标准过于主观化、模糊化等问题,在疑难案件中的适用存在困难。近年来,客观归责理论引入我国,引起了学术界的广泛讨论,支持者和批判者站在不同的角度对该理论进行了分析评论。该理论将因果关系与归责问题相区别,因果关系的存在以修正的条件说为前提,对归责问题进行三个层次的递进分析,更加便于解决实际问题。There are three major categories of traditional causality theory in China. Among them, the inevitable causal relationship and the accidental causality theory are the general. The traditional causality theory has improperly expanded or improperly narrowed the scope of causality, and the judgment criteria are too subjective and fuzzy. There are difficulties in its application in complicated cases. In recent years, the introduction of objective attribution theory- into China has aroused extensive discussion in the academic field. Supporters and critics analyze and comment from different angles. The theory distinguishes causality from the problem of imputation. The existence of causality is premised on the condition of revision, and the three-level progressive analysis of imputation is more convenient to solve practical problems.

关 键 词：必然因果关系 偶然因果关系 条件说 相当因果关系说 客观归责 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]