基于“三域”理论的结果连词主观性研究  

A study of subjectivity in Chinese causal connectives based on the “three domains” theory

作　　者：梁珊珊[1] 陈楠 LIANG Shan-shan;CHEN Nan(School of International Education,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China;School of Literature and Communication,Huizhou University,Huizhou 516007,China)

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学,国际教育学院,广东广州510006 [2]惠州学院,文学与传媒学院,广东惠州516007

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（对外汉语教学与研究版）》2018年第6期55-64,共10页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“外国留学生汉语口语语篇因果标记习得研究”(Y9170080);华南理工大学“广东省公共外交与跨文化传播研究基地”成果之一

摘　　要：文章基于"三域"理论,对汉语中6个常用因果连词的使用域进行统计,考察其主观性大小,结果为:"可见">"所以">"因此/因而">"于是">"结果",并发现连词主观性大小对句子的认知和合法性会产生影响。其次,发现零形式标记比显性标记使用频繁,常用于"非意愿性行域""非因果知域"和"言域"。研究结果有助于汉语教学中对结果连词使用域的解释和结果连词的区分。Based on the theory of “three conceptual domains”, we have investigated the causal categories of six frequently used Chinese causal connectives to identify their different kinds of subjectivity. The results show that “kejian （可见）” is the most subjective connective, followed by “suoyi （所以）”, “yinci/yiner （因此/因而）”, “yushi （于是）” and “jieguo （结果）”. The subjectivity of each connective deeply influences one＇s cognition and grammatical well-formedness of sentences. Subsequently, we find the zero-form marker is used more frequently than explicit markers, and is often used in the “non-volitional relations”,“non-causal epistemic relations” and “speech-act relations”. Results of this research can benefit CSL teaching in explaining the register of causal connectives and differences in causal connectives.

关 键 词：三域 结果连词 主观性 零形式标记 

分 类 号：H14[语言文字—汉语]