身份悖论与印度自由贸易战略的困境  

Identity Paradox and the Dilemma of India's Free-Trade Strategy

作　　者：贺平[1] 周倩茹 HE Ping;ZHOU Qianru(Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海200433

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2018年第11期35-45,共11页Pacific Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"RCEP与TPP背景下的中国亚太跨区域开放合作战略研究"(13CGJ029);教育部国别和区域研究课题"亚太区域合作的历史;现状与未来发展"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：尽管印度的自由贸易协定数量众多且对象国多元化程度较高,但从货物贸易的关税减免率、服务贸易所涵盖的部门和领域、"新加坡议题"涉及范围等指标而言,其协议的水平普遍较低。这与印度在自由贸易战略上雄心勃勃的国家身份设定形成了鲜明的反差。"大国情结"、经济发展水平与产业结构、特殊利益集团牵制、在全球贸易规则制定上的"弱势地位"和"负面形象"是这一悖论产生的主要原因。印度的案例也为其他国家制定名实相副的自由贸易战略身份提供了诸多政策启示。For India, despite highly diversified partner countries and a large number of free trade agreements, the effectiveness of which is generally low in terms of the tariff reduction rate of trade in goods, sec-tors and areas of trade in services, and the scope of the “Singapore issues”. The aforementioned reality con？trasts sharply with India＇s national identity that calls for ambitions in free？trade strategy. The “great powercomplex”, economic development level and industrial structure, special interest groups, and the “ disad-vantageous position” and “negative image” in the formulation of global trade rules are the main reasons forsuch a paradox. Furthermore, the case of India has provided policy implications for other countries to formu-late veritable national identities in free？trade strategy.

关 键 词：印度 自由贸易战略 国家身份 悖论 

分 类 号：D83[政治法律—政治学] D87[政治法律—外交学]