机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院临床医学三系,杭州310058 [2]浙江省衢州市人民医院(浙江大学衢州医院)检验科
出 处:《中华检验医学杂志》2018年第11期853-857,共5页Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科研基金(2017KY698)
摘 要:目的探讨胸腔积液肝素结合蛋白(HBP)检测在胸腔积液患者中对肺炎旁胸腔积液(PPE)鉴别诊断的应用价值。方法病例对照研究。收集2018年2至7月在衢州市人民医院住院的189例胸腔积液患者的胸腔积液标本,其中肺炎旁胸腔积液(肺炎组)72例,结核性胸腔积液(结核组)24例,恶性胸腔积液(恶性组)46例,其他原因引起的漏出液(漏出液组)47例。对所有胸腔积液进行常规分析和胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、胸腔积液总蛋白(TP)检测,并采用酶联免疫吸附法测定胸腔积液HBP水平。各组总体水平差异采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,方差齐性多组比较采用单因素方差分析,方差不齐多组比较采用LSD检验,计数资料比较采用卡方检验。绘制ROC曲线评价胸腔积液中HBP、LDH、ADA、TP水平在PPE鉴别诊断中的应用。结果胸腔积液HBP浓度在肺炎组为316.1(99.5,399.8)ng/ml,结核组为64.7(18.6,96.8)ng/ml,恶性组15.2(8.4,33.3)ng/ml,漏出液组14.1(6.5,23.0)ng/ml。肺炎组胸腔积液HBP水平与其他3组之间比较,差异有统计学意义(H=120.3,P〈0.05)。当cut-off值为64.2 ng/ml时受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.953,灵敏度为88.9%(64/72),特异度为89.7%(105/117),阳性预测值为84.2%(64/76),阴性预测值为92.9%(105/113),总符合率为89.4%(169/189)。结论胸腔积液HBP水平诊断效能高,能较好区分胸腔积液患者的PPE,可能是PPE鉴别诊断的生物标志物。ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein(HBP)in differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion.MethodsCase-control study. The pleural effusion of 189 patients with pleural effusion admitted to Quzhou People′s Hospital from February to July 2018, including parapneumonic effusion (n=72), tuberculous pleural effusion(n=24), cases of malignant pleural effusion (n=46) and transudative pleural effusion (n=47) were collected. Routine analysis, lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and total protein(TP)examination of all pleural effusions were performed. The levels of heparin-binding protein in the patients′ pleural fluid were measured by ELISA. The difference in the overall level of each group was determined by One-way ANOVA or LSD test followed by Kruskal-Wallis H test dependence on the homogeneity of variances. The categorical data was analyzed by chi-square test.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic value of heparin-binding protein for parapneumonic effusion.ResultsThe concentration of heparin-binding protein was low in malignant pleural effusion[15.2(8.4, 33.3)ng/ml]and transudative effusion[14.1(6.5, 23.0)ng/ml], but high in parapneumonic effusion[316.1(99.5, 399.8)ng/ml]and tuberculous pleurisy[64.7 (18.6, 96.8) ng/ml]. The heparin-binding protein level in parapneumonic effusion was significantly different from the other three groups (H=120.3, P〈0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for an optimal discrimination between parapneumonic effusion from non-parapneumonic effusion could be performed at a cut-off point of 64.2 ng/ml with area under the curve of 0.953[sensitivity: 88.9%(64/72), specificity: 89.7%(105/117), positive predictive value: 84.2%(64/76), negative predictive value: 92.9%(105/113)].ConclusionsHeparin-binding proteinin pleural fluid is effective to be used to classify par
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...