马克思主义视野中的旧西藏政教合一制度  

The Merging of Religious and Secular Rule in old Tibet in Marxism

作　　者：陈亚联[1] Chen Ya-lian(Academy of Marxism Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing lO0732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院,北京100732

出　　处：《西藏研究》2018年第4期1-10,共10页Tibetan Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大特别委托项目"政教合一制度对西藏农牧区的现实影响及对策研究"(项目编号:XZ1201)阶段性成果

摘　　要：马克思、恩格斯批判继承了黑格尔等欧洲哲学家对宗教的批判,他们在批判宗教国家和唯心主义哲学过程中,对西藏政教合一制度也有论述;以毛泽东为代表的中国共产党人运用马克思主义基本原理分析西藏历史上的政教合一制度,指出其社会形态上属于封建农奴制,政体上属于政教合一,出路在于通过民主改革走社会主义道路。唯物史观是科学打开西藏政教合一制度研究的一把钥匙,是破解、揭穿各种关于西藏研究的神秘主义和美化西藏历史上政教合一的封建农奴制的利器。Marx and Engels criticized and inherited the criticism of religion by Hegel and other European philosophers. They also discussed the system of The Merging of Religious and Secular in Tibet when When they criticized religious state and idealism philosophy. Mao Zedong the representative of the Chinese Communist Party,used the basic principles of Marxism to analyze the system of the merging of religious and secular in Tibetan history. Mao pointed out that its social form belongs to feudal serfdom,its political system belongs to the unity of politics and religion and its outlet lies in taking the socialist road through democratic reform. Historical materialism is a key to scientifically opening up the study of Tibet＇s The Merging of Religious and Secular system. It is also a way to break through and expose various mysticism about Tibetan studies and beautify the feudal serfdom of The Merging of Religious and Secular Rule in Tibetan history.

关 键 词：绝对精神 国家与教会 唯物史观 政教合一 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]