实行行为定型性对“口袋罪”适用的限制——从寻衅滋事罪引入、导出  

The Restraints of the Stereotype of Perpetrating Act on the Indefinite Crime——Introduction and Adoption of the Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Troubles

作　　者：冯国波 崔志伟 Feng Guobo;Cui Zhiwei(School of Criminal Justice,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事司法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《铁道警察学院学报》2018年第3期73-78,共6页Journal of Railway Police College

摘　　要："口袋罪"的设立基于实质上的社会危害性以及处罚必要性,力求"疏而不漏",但这种实质正义的实现以牺牲形式合理性为前提。类型化思维源于问题的"本质",与社会危害性的实质考量不谋而合,但其极度"开放性"有违罪刑法定原则的初衷,也不利于罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的界定。形式优先于实质是依法治国初期的应有之义,过度的类型化并不利于形式理性的确立。实行行为定型性力求实现犯罪的个别化机能,拒绝罪界的模糊性,减少罪名适用的肆意与混乱。定型性基于形式理性的内在要求,对"口袋罪"存在天然的反对,在立法仍旧保留"口袋罪"的不得已情形下,司法应当保持足够的克制。＂The Indefinite Crime＂is aimed to restrain and punish the substantive social crimes under the principle of＂loose but never miss＂, while the realization of the actual justice is on the premise of the loss of formal rationality. The stereotype comes from the core of matter and is accordant with the prevention of social crimes, but its extreme＂openness＂violates the principle of legality and makes an adverse effect on the identification of a crime or a non-crime and the differentiation of crimes. It is the country＇s requirement of lawbased governance to take the form as priority instead of the substance, for the overwhelmed stereotype is harmful to formal rationality. The stereotype of perpetrating act is to define the specific crime and goes against the fuzzy classification of crimes, lessening the abuse and confusion of the imposed crime. The stereotype is in line with the value of formal rationality and opposes in essence the indefinite crime.

关 键 词：实行行为定型性 类型化 口袋罪 寻衅滋事罪 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]