检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建[1] 陈爽[1] 王强[1] 李守燕 朱秀波 LI Jian;CHEN Shuang;FANG Qiang;LI Shouyan;ZHU Xiubo(Department of Urology,LuzhouTraditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]泸州市中医医院泌尿外科,四川泸州646000
出 处:《中国性科学》2018年第9期23-26,共4页Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基 金:四川省泸州市科技计划项目[2013-S-45(3/5)]
摘 要:目的:探讨慢性前列腺炎患者实施水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗的效果。方法:对泸州市中医医院2015年4月至2017年4月收治的80例慢性前列腺炎患者的临床资料进行统计分析,依据治疗方法将这些患者分为水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗组(联合治疗组,n=40)和单独微波治疗组(单独治疗组,n=40)两组,对两组患者的临床症状、临床疗效、性生活质量进行统计分析。结果:联合治疗组患者的疼痛或不适、排尿异常、生活质量评分及NIH-CPSI总分均显著低于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05),治疗的总有效率90. 0%(36/40)显著高于单独治疗组72. 5%(29/40),差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05),性欲、性唤起、性高潮、性生活频率、性生活接受度、性关系满意度评分均显著高于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0. 05),性行为症状发生比例评分显著低于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论:慢性前列腺炎患者实施水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗的效果较单独微波治疗好。Objective:To investigate the effect of nficrowave treatment with leech and centipede suppository of patients with chronic prostatitis. Methods : The clinical data of 80 cases of patients with chronic prostatitis in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were statistically analyzed, these patients were divided into treatment group microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository treatment group (combined treatment group, n = 40) and separate microwave therapy group (single treatment group, n =40) two groups according to the treatment methods, the clinical symptoms ,clinical efficacy, quality of life of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results: The pain or discomfort, abnormal urination, quality of life scores and NIH-CPSI score of the confined treatment group were significantly lower (P 〈 0.05 ), the total treatment efficiency 90.0% (36/40) was significantly higher than the single treatment group 72.5% (29/40) ( P 〈 0.05 ), the sexuality and sexual arouse, orgasm, sexual life frequency life, acceptance, relationship satisfaction scores were significantly higher ( P 〈 0. 05 ), the sex proportion of symptoms score was significantly lower than the single treatment group ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusions : The effect of microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository is better than separate microwave therapy of patients with chronic prostatitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171