检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许超[1,2] 张彬[3] 马连军[4] 刘蛟龙[1] 张浩波 马刚[1] XU Chao;ZHANG Bin;MA Lianjun;LIU Jiaolong;ZHANG Haobo;MA Gang(Reproductive Medicine Research Center,Shandong University,Jinan 250021,Shandong,China;Department of Urology,Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,Jinan 250021,Shandong,China;Department of Andrology,Tai'an Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Tai'an 271000,Shandong,China;Department of Andrology,Weifang Traditional Chinese Medcine Hospital,Weifang 261041,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学生殖医学研究中心泌尿外科和男性生殖科,济南250021 [2]山东大学齐鲁医院泌尿外科,济南250012 [3]泰安市妇幼保健院男科,山东泰安271000 [4]潍坊市中医院男科,山东潍坊261041
出 处:《中国性科学》2018年第10期47-50,共4页Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基 金:山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2015QY004-19);山东省科技发展计划项目(2014GSF118161)
摘 要:目的:采用3级分类方法评估男性睾丸微石症患者的精液参数。方法:回顾性分析山东大学生殖医学研究中心297例经阴囊超声诊断为睾丸微石症患者的临床资料。依据B超图像一个切面点状强回声数量的多少,将患者分为3个级别:1级(1个~5个),2级(6个~20个)以及3级(> 20个),统计并分析各级别TM患者的精液参数。结果:本组患者年龄(29. 21±4. 82)岁,年龄范围21岁~46岁,睾丸体积(15. 68±3. 82) ml,睾丸体积范围3. 55 ml^26. 03ml。其中1级TM患者为95例、2级127例、3级75例,各级别TM患者主要精液参数如精子浓度、总活力、前向运动精子比例分别为(53. 54±38. 46百万/ml、48. 76±37. 08百万/ml、35. 70±28. 92百万/ml,P=0. 004),(55. 78±22. 74%、51. 49±24. 35%、44. 05±22. 50%,P=0. 005)以及(43. 72±19. 66%、40. 24±21. 04%、34. 34±19. 69%,P=0. 011)。2级TM的精液参数与3级相比有差异,与1级比没有差异。结论:与传统分类方法相比,将睾丸微石症分为3级可以更好地评估睾丸微石症程度与精液参数之间的关系。睾丸微石症的分级越高,精液质量相对较差。睾丸微石症2级患者的精液参数不稳定。Objective: To evaluate the semen parameters of testicular microlithiasis( TM) with a ThreeGrade classification for patients with fertility intention. Methods: Medical records of 297 patients diagnosed with TM by scrotal ultrasound were reviewed retrospectively. According to the maximum number of microliths with any image,patients were divided into three grades: Grade 1( 1-5 microliths),Grade 2( 6-20 microliths) and Grade 3( 〉20 microliths). Semen parameters of each grade were collected and analyzed. Results: The mean age was 29. 21 ±4. 82 years( range,21-46 yrs.) while mean testicular volume was 15. 68 ± 3. 82 ml( range,3. 55-26. 03 ml).There were 95 patients in Grade 1,127 patients in Grade 2 and 75 patients in Grade 3. Main semen parameters such as sperm concentration,total motility and percentage of progressively motile of each grade was( 53. 54 ± 38. 46 million/ml vs. 48. 76 ± 37. 08 million/ml vs. 35. 70 ± 28. 92 million/ml,P = 0. 004),( 55. 78 ± 22. 74% vs.51. 49 ± 24. 35% vs. 44. 05 ± 22. 50%,P = 0. 005) and( 43. 72 ± 19. 66% vs. 40. 24 ± 21. 04% vs. 34. 34 ±19. 69%,P = 0. 011),respectively. Most semen parameters of Grade 2 showed statistically significant differences with that of Grade 3 yet no differences with Grade 1. Conclusions: TM could be classifed as three grades for patients with fertility intention,comparing with the conventional classification,which could better represent the association of TM and semen parameters. The semen parameters correlates inversely with grades. Grade 2 could be considered as a gray area which presents amphibolous semen parameters.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195