检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王红芳[1] 陆兆甜 刘雷[1] 张锋[1] WANG Hong-fang;LU Zhao-tian;LIU Lei;ZHANG Feng(Department of Psychology,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China)
出 处:《应用心理学》2018年第4期344-354,共11页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ17C090002)
摘 要:研究采用最后通牒博弈任务探讨了抑郁个体在获益和损失情境中对不公平决策方案反应模式的特点,结果发现:(1)抑郁和非抑郁被试对不公平决策的拒绝率随不公平水平的提高而提高,但在损失情境中的拒绝率显著高于获益情境;(2)抑郁被试对获益情境的不公平决策的拒绝率显著高于非抑郁被试,而对损失情境的反应模式与非抑郁被试一致。这表明,尽管抑郁和非抑郁个体均对损失情境的不公平性表现出高敏感性,但前者对获益情境不公平性的敏感性也更高。The present study aimed to investigate the response patterns of depressive individuals to unfair distribution in the gain and loss situations. The results showed that : ( 1 ) The rejection rates of both depressive and non-depressive individuals were significantly improved with the increase of the level of unfairness ; the rejection rates of all participants were greater in the loss situation than in the gain situation. (2) Compared with non-depressive individuals, the depressive individuals had a greater rejection rate in the gain situation, but such an effect was not present in the loss situation. These results indicated that, though the context modulates how both depressive and non-depressive individuals respond to the unfair distribution, the depressive individuals tend to show higher sensitivity to unfair distribution than non-depressive individuals in the gain situation. The present study facilitates to understand the interpersonal avoidance and alienation behavior of depressive polulation in real life.
关 键 词:抑郁个体 不公平决策 获益/损失情境 最后通牒博弈任务
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28