检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柏建利 佘栋成 BAI Jianli;SHE Dongcheng(Sichuan Shutong Geotechnical Engineering Co.,Chengdu 61000)
机构地区:[1]四川省蜀通岩土工程公司
出 处:《土工基础》2018年第5期484-486,497,共4页Soil Engineering and Foundation
摘 要:公路滑坡治理不仅能保证交通畅通、减少经济和财产损失,而且能改善已遭到破坏的生态环境。目前我国治理公路高陡边坡、滑坡的主要措施有SNS柔性防护技术、喷锚网支护技术、抗滑桩体系。而抗滑桩则由于具有适应性强、工期较短、抗滑能力强等优点成为滑坡治理工程中主要方法之一。通过对某公路滑坡的稳定性进行详细分析,并结合该滑坡工程地质特征及危害范围等因素,对滑坡治理方案的比选,采取了以抗滑桩为主,结合锚杆和挡土墙为辅的综合治理方案,达到了预期目标,为同地区相似滑坡治理工程提供了经验。Effectively mitigating the highway landslide can not only to ensure the smooth flow of traffic and reduce the potential economic and property losses,it can also improve the compromised ecological environment.The popular highway slope mitigation methods are Soft Net System(SNS),ground anchor with netting and shotcrete system and sliding resisting caissons.The sliding resisting caisson method has the advantage of applicable in landslide with different conditions,short construction schedule and fairly good results and has been used as a major landslide mitigation tool.This paper presents a case history of the evaluation of a highway landslide.Different mitigation methods are compared based on the site-specific conditions and the sliding resisting caisson method that combined with ground anchors and retaining walls were selected.The results are satisfactory.
分 类 号:P642[天文地球—工程地质学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200