法哲学在何种意义上有助于部门法学  

What Can Legal Philosophy Do for Specific Laws

作　　者：雷磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2018年第5期1178-1201,共24页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金："中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持资助项目"阶段性成果

摘　　要：法哲学所面对的最大批评在于与部门法学及司法实践的疏离。部门法学知识的主体是法教义学,而法哲学是关于法的一般哲学理论,两者间的关系主要体现在疑难案件的场合。在法概念论的层面上,法概念争议会影响疑难案件中法律规范之效力的认定,这可能但不必然会影响裁判结论,但必然会影响判决的整个论证和说理的思路。在法学方法论的层面上,法律适用基本模式的分歧会造成裁判论证方式上的重要区分,司法哲学立场的差异可能会对相同的案件得出不同的裁判结论。在法伦理学的层面上,规范伦理学立场间的对立会影响个案的裁判后果。总之,法哲学的作用方式是间接的而不是直接的,通常在法教义学框架和体系内发挥作用;它旨在复杂化而非简化论证,试图揭示问题背后深层而复杂的理论分歧。The most serious critique that legal philosophy faces is its alienation from specific laws and judicial practices. While the mainstream tradition of specific laws is that of legal dogmatics, legal philoso-phy constitutes a general theory of philosophy about law, whose relationship manifests itself clearly in hard cases. In the domain of concept of law, the disputes about concept of law have an impact on the va-lidity of a legal norm, which can, but do not necessarily influence judicial decision, although they will certainly affect the way of argumentation and reasoning in the whole decision procedure. In the domain of legal methodology, the divergence on basic model of legal application makes an important difference in way of judicial argumentation, and the discrepancy in judicial philosophy may lead to different conclusion in the same case. In the domain of legal ethics, the antagonism between different standpoints in norma-tive ethics will have impact on judicial consequences. In short, legal philosophy functions in an indirect way, which usually plays a part in the framework and system of legal dogmatics; and it aims to make the arguments more complicated, not more simplified, which tries to reveal the deep and intricate theoretical disagreements behind the controversies of doctrinal problems.

关 键 词：(部门)法教义学 法概念论 法学方法论 法伦理学 疑难案件 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]