单行条例民族自治功能的回归——基于自治州单行条例与地方性法规的比较  

Regression of the Autonomous Function of the Individual Regulations:——A Comparative Study of Autonomous Prefecture Individual Regulations and Local Regulations

作　　者：王玎[1] WANG Ding

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2018年第3期51-55,共5页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

摘　　要：各自治州制定的单行条例存在民族性特点不足、单行条例与地方性法规混乱并行以及非民族性单行条例违背授权初衷等问题。自治州单行条例与地方性法规在立法主体、内容、程序等方面均具有高度的同质性,二者实际处于同一法律位阶。《宪法》《立法法》和《民族区域自治法》赋予单行条例的民族自治功能亟待重新确认。单行条例的民族自治功能实现,有赖于《立法法》进一步明确单行条例与地方性法规的范围边界;严格规范单行条例的制定和报批程序,对内容是否包含民族性特点进行重点审查;以及贯彻实施单行条例的合宪性审查机制。The individual regulations established by the autonomous prefectures include the lack of national characteristics, the chaotic parallelism between individual regulations and local regulations, and the violation of the original intentions of Constitutional authorization. The individual regulations and local regulations of autonomous prefectures have a high degree of homogeneity in terms of legislation subject, content, and procedures, and the two are actually at the same legal level The functions of ethnic autonomy entrusted to individual regulations by Constitution, the Legislation Law, and the National Regional Autonomy Act need to be reconfirmed. The realization of the national autonomy function for individual regulations depends on the fact that the Legislation Law should further clarify the scope of the individual regulations and local regulations; strictly regulate the formulation and approval procedures of individual regulations, and conduct a critical review of whether the contents contain national characteristics; and implement constitutionality review mechanism on individual regulations on.

关 键 词：单行条例 地方性法规 民族区域自治 合宪性审查 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]