检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪麟[1] 温绣蔺[1] 乔丽娜[1] 金鲜珍[1] 曲展 WANG Lin;WEN Xiulin;QIAO Lina;JIN Xianzhen;QU Zhan(TCM Department,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi忆an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710061,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学第一附属医院中医科,陕西西安710061
出 处:《西部中医药》2018年第11期90-92,共3页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:西安交通大学第一附属医院科研课题(编号2013YK48)
摘 要:目的:观察复方桐叶烧伤油联合改良式负压吸引法治疗慢性难愈合创面的临床疗效。方法:将慢性难愈合创面患者80例随机分为治疗组和对照组各40例,对照组予传统方法清创、换药,治疗组予复方桐叶烧伤油联合改良式负压吸引处理,观察2组患者临床疗效。结果:治疗组疗效优于对照组(Z=-6. 458,P=0. 000),创面愈合时间及医疗费用低于对照组(P<0. 05),换药时2组患者疼痛程度比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-1. 752,P=0. 08)。结论:复方桐叶烧伤油联合改良式负压吸引治疗慢性难愈合创面具有减少换药次数、促进创面愈合、缓解患者疼痛及费用低廉的优点。Objective: To observe the effects of compound paulownia leaf burn oil and modified vacuumsuction method in treating the patients with chronic refractory wounds. Methods: Eighty patients were randomizedinto the treatment group and the control group, 40 cases each group, the control group had the wounds cleaned andthe dressing changed by traditional methods, the treatment group were treated by compound paulownia leaf burn oiland modified vacuum suction method, clinical effects of both groups were observed. Results: The treatment groupwas superior to the control group in clinical effects( Z=-6.458, P=0.000), lower than the control group in woundhealing time and medical costs(P〈0.05). When changed the dressing, the comparison of pain degree between bothgroups had no statistical difference(Z=-1.752, P=0.08). Conclusion: Compound paulownia leaf burn oil andmodified vacuum suction method in treating the patients with chronic refractory wounds possess the advantages ofreducing the times of changing the dressing, promoting wound healing, relieving the patients' pain and low cost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.207.156