检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴显鹏 Pei Xianpeng(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院
出 处:《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2017年第6期128-133,共6页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:《保险法解释三》第8条摒弃了《保险法》所采的保险复效模式,改采“可保模式”。这种模式可较好的平衡寿险复效中的逆向选择防范需求和被保险人利益。但现行制度下,有部分危险显著增加的被保险人,虽不意图逆向选择,但由于制度的不完善被排斥在复效门外。此为逆向选择防范之“副作用”,应综合运用法律解释与立法完善两种方法予以“治疗”,从而更为精准的处理逆向选择防范与被保险人利益保护。Insurance Law Act III Clause VIII turns the old pattern of reinstatement of insurance to pattern of insura- bility. The new pattern can not only avoid the insurant to make adverse selection but also restrict the insurer refusing re- instatement of insurance unreasonably. However, in order to avoid adverse selection, the new pattern also has side - effect, which refuses some insurants' application who have no adverse choice. Therefore,we should via legal explanation and legislation to promote the balance between the insurer and the insurant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.228