论我国妊娠女性生育权的行使限度——以对《婚姻法司法解释(三)》第9条的分析为视角  

On Exercising Limits of Pregnant Women’s Reproductive Right in China——From the Perspective of the Analysis of Article 9 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Marriage Law( 3)

作　　者：郄乔慧 Qie Qiaohui(School of Information,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2018年第4期132-138,共7页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：《婚姻法司法解释（三）》第9条规定引发了外界怀疑法律＂性别歧视＂的极大的争议。从生育权动态的二分结构以及各国的立法现状来看,该条司法解释正是基于男女双方生理的差异所作出的规定,并未忽视男性的生育权。但由于其并未对女性擅自中止妊娠的理由做出任何规定,不符合《婚姻法》的立法目的和宗旨,结合侵权责任以及违约责任的相关原理,对该条司法解释进行目的性限缩,将妊娠女性生育权的行使限制在合理理由的范围内,实现男女双方生育权的实质平等,以彰显法律的公平公正。Article 9 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Marriage Law（ 3） has caused a great controversy over the outside world to suspect the ＂sex discrimination＂of the law. Judging from the dynamic dichotomy of reproductive rights and the legislative status of countries,this judicial interpretation is based on the physiological differences between men and women and does not ignore the reproductive rights of men. However,because it did not make any provision for women＇s grounds for arbitrarily stopping pregnancy,it did not comply with the legislative purpose and purpose of the＂Marriage Law＂. Combined with the principles of tort liability and liability for breach of contract,the purpose of this judicial interpretation was limited. The exercise of the reproductive rights of pregnant women is limited to reasonable grounds,realizing the substantive equality of the reproductive rights of both men and women,so as to demonstrate the fairness and justice of the law.

关 键 词：擅自中止妊娠 生育权 行使限制 合理理由 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]