票据质押的设立规则及其效力  

The Applicable Rules and Validity of Negotiable Instruments

作　　者：张罕武 Zhang Hanwu(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2017年第3期112-116,共5页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：我国《物权法》规定汇票、本票、支票可以予以质押,实际上质押的不是票据本身,而是票据权利。票据因其流通性强、安全性大的特点最适宜作为担保标的。但是就票据质押的设立规则来说,《票据法》与《物权法》存在立法上的冲突,也导致了实践中该规则适用的混乱。现有的观点经分析发现其存在不完善之处。从权利质权的本质出发,应认为背书质押不是票据设质的生效要件,依据《物权法》的相关规则可以设立票据质权。Chinese Property Law regulate that the bill of exchange,promissory note and cheque can be pledged.Actually the object of pledge is not the bill itself,but the right of the bill. The right of negotiable instrument is the creditor＇s right of money,which is the most secure and the most circulating right in all claims. The law of negotiable instruments and the property law have conflicts in legislation about bill pledge,which lead to the chaos of the application of the rules. Existing theories have shown its imperfection. From the nature of right perspective,the pledge of endorsement is not necessary element to set up a bill pledge. The rights of negotiable instruments can be set according to the rules of property law.

关 键 词：质押背书 权利质权 票据权利 

分 类 号：D922.287[政治法律—经济法学]