论剑桥学派对政治思想史研究方法的变革——以斯金纳历史语境主义为例  

The Reform of Cambridge School’s Research Method on the History of Political Thought——A Case Study With Skinner’s Historical Contextualism

作　　者：李林峰 邓新星 Li Linfeng;Deng Xinxing(School of Politics and Administration,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学政治与行政学院

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2018年第3期111-116,共6页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：历史主义和文本中心主义是传统的政治思想史研究方法,虽然这些传统研究方法在很多层面上行之有效,但也存在一些问题和困境;对此,剑桥学派对传统研究方法提出了系统性的批评,其中斯金纳的历史语境主义最具代表性,而且该方法论确实也为思想史的研究做出了贡献;不过,斯金纳的历史语境主义研究方法自身也存在语境本身的有效性和价值性问题,同时也忽视了文本产生之后所具有的独立性问题,并且专断地排除了其他可能可行的研究方法,这些问题都值得研究者质疑与思考。Historicism and text-centrism are the traditional research methods of the history of political thought.Although these traditional research methods are effective on many levels,there are still many problems and difficulties.The Cambridge School has made systematic criticism of traditional research methods,of which Skinner＇s historical contextualism is the most representative,and the methodology has indeed contributed to the study of the history of thought.Skinner＇s research method of historical contextualism also has its own problems of validity and value of context itself,include neglecting the independence of the text after it is produced,and excluding other possible and feasible research methods.These problems are worthy of questioning and thinking by researchers.

关 键 词：政治思想史 剑桥学派 斯金纳 历史语境主义 

分 类 号：C912.4[经济管理]