检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石阳媚 Shi Yangmei(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院
出 处:《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2018年第3期124-128,共5页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:基于绝对的知法推定的动摇,不知法律可以成为罪责的阻却事由。违法性认识不可避免的成为理论研究的核心。受不知法不免责的传统原则影响,无论是立法还是司法实践,对违法性认识的把握仍十分严苛。厘清违法性认识的理论争议,对于违法性认识具体应用的探索是必要的。明确违法性认识的判断标准,构建兼顾责任主义和一般预防功能的方案,使其在认定犯罪与确定责任时具有可操作性,从而真正发挥违法性认识在司法实践中的平衡功能。According to the collapse of absolute presumption of legal knowledge,the mistake of law is recognized as a limitation of criminal culpability.The cognition of illegality has inevitably become the core of theoretical research.Based on the principle of the ignorance of law is no excuse,no matter in legislation or judicial practice,the understanding of illegality is still very strict.It is necessary to clarify the theoretical disputes of illegal consciousness for exploring the specific application of illegal consciousness.We have to define judgment standard of illegality,build both responsibility and general prevention function method,in order to make it operational when criminalizing and determining responsibility,and give full play to balance the function of illegal consciousness in the judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7