检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓巧红 林清燕 DENG Oiao-hong;LIN Qing-yan(Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xiamen City,Xiamen,Fujian Province,361000 China)
机构地区:[1]福建省厦门市妇幼保健院产房,福建厦门361000
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2018年第20期182-183,186,共3页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的探析应用连续护理干预对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局及血糖改善的影响。方法选取该院于2016年3月—2018年4月收治的100例妊娠期糖尿病患者,将其随机分为对照组与观察组,每组50例。其中对照组予以常规护理干预,观察组则予以延续性护理干预。之后对比两组患者的妊娠结局及相关血糖指标的改善情况。结果观察组经延续性护理干预后,患者相关血糖指标改善情况显著高于对照组;且观察组患者妊娠结局显著优于对照组,两组相较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将延续性护理干预贯入到妊娠期糖尿病患者的整体护理中,可有效促进患者相关血糖的改善情况,并显著改善其妊娠结局,加快其预后病情恢复,值得临床大力借鉴普及。Objective To analyze the effect of continuous nursing intervention on pregnancy outcome and blood glucose improvement in patients with gestational diabetes. Methods One hundred patients with gestational diabetes admitted to the hospital from March 2016 to April 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group received continuous nursing intervention. The pregnancy outcomes and related glycemic indicators were compared between the two groups. Results After continuous nursing intervention in the observation group, the improvement of the relevant blood glucose index was significantly higher than that of the control group. The pregnancy outcome of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Continuous care intervention into the overall care of patients with gestational diabetes can effectively improve the patient's related blood glucose, and significantly improve the pregnancy outcome, accelerate the recovery of its prognosis, it is worthy of clinical popularization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145