试析WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》中的严重侵害实体规则  

Studies on the Substantive Rules of Serious Prejudice in SCM Agreement

作　　者：欧福永[1] 罗文正[2] OU Fu-yong;LUO Wen-zheng(Law School of Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081,China;Hengyang Normal University,Hengyang,Hunan 421008,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081 [2]衡阳师范学院,湖南衡阳421008

出　　处：《时代法学》2018年第6期13-20,共8页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：2013年司法部项目:WTO<补贴与反补贴措施协定>中的严重侵害规则研究(编号:13SFB3040)成果之一

摘　　要：《补贴与反补贴措施协定》第5条和第6条规定了补贴的严重侵害规则,包括严重侵害推定规则和严重侵害认定规则及严重侵害例外规则。在WTO实践中,由于缺乏对于"严重侵害"的定义性规定,WTO专家组和上诉机构通过对"补贴的影响"、"相关市场"、"取代与阻碍"和"价格抑制和价格压低或销售损失"等关键术语的解读,在实践中发展了有关严重侵害实体规则的法理,并将在今后的实践中不断丰富对严重侵害实体规则的认知。Articles 5 and 6 of SCM agreement stipulate the rules for serious prejudice of subsi-dies, including the rules of presumption of serious prejudice and the rules of determination of seriousprejudice and the rule of exception of serious prejudice. In WTO practice, due to the lack of a defi-nition of “serious prejudice”, WTO panels and the appellate body has developed jurisprudence onthe substantive rules of serious prejudice, by analyzing key terms such as “the effect of the subsi-dy”, “relevant market”, “displaces”, “impedes”, “ price suppression”, “ price depression” and“lost sales”. WTO panels and the appellate body will enrich people,s cognition of the substantiverules of serious prejudice in the future practice.

关 键 词：补贴与反补贴措施协定 严重侵害 实体规则 

分 类 号：DF964[政治法律—国际法学]