检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都军医学院,成都610053 [2]后勤工程学院,重庆400041 [3]交通部重庆公路科学研究所,重庆400067
出 处:《地下空间》2002年第3期252-255,共4页Underground Space
摘 要:本文将非严格平衡条分法与严格平衡条分法中的各种方法都综合成统一公式。统一公式是两个代数方程 ,非严格条分法只需解一个方程 ,严格条分法解两个方程 ,不仅便于编程 ,而且计算简单、准确。通过分析比较 ,说明瑞典法、不平衡推力法都是极小值解 ,稳定安全系数最小 ;简化Bishop法稳定安全系数高出瑞典法 6~ 7% ,而严格条分法中的Spence法的稳定安全系数高出简化Bishop法的 2~ 3%。The various methods from un strict equilibrium slice method and strict equilibrium slice method are synthesized and a unified formula has been obtained. The united formula consists of two algebraic equations. There is one equation needed for the un strict slice method and two for the strict slice method, so it is easy to program and give simple and accurate calculation. The results show by the analysis and comparison, that the Swedish method and un equilibrium thrust method give low limit value with the least stability safety factor. The stability safety factor by the concise Bishop method is more by 6 7 percent than that by the Swedish method and the stability safety factor of Spence method is more by 2 3 percent than that of the concise Bishop method.
分 类 号:U416.12[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222