物权行为无因性原则新论  

Abstract Principle of Juristic Act of Real Right

作　　者：唐烈英[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南民族学院法学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《西南民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2002年第10期12-16,共5页Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：作者指出了法学界物权行为无因性肯定说与否定说两种主张的缺陷 ,从债权有效行为 ,物权行为有效或无效 ;债权行为无效 ,物权行为有效或无效四种具体情形入手 ,从新的视角论证了物权行为都不以债权行为为原因的见解 ;The author points out the defects of affirmative and negative abstract principle of juristic act of real right in law circle. According to the four situation: effective act of credit, juristic act of real right is valid or invalid, and invalidity of act of obligation, juristic act of real right is valid or invalid, the paper gives the opinion that juristic act of real right doesn't take act of credit as the reason from a new angle and also gives the reason why real law should adopt the abstract principle of juristic act of real right.

关 键 词：物权行为 物权行为无因性 债权行为 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]