检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周彬[1,2] 钟林生[2] 陈田[2] 张爱平[2]
机构地区:[1]宁波大学旅游系,浙江宁波315211 [2]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101
出 处:《地理科学》2015年第5期599-607,共9页Scientia Geographica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41301141;41171435);浙江省自然科学基金(LY13D010007);浙江省海洋文化与经济研究中心科研项目(12JDHY03YB);宁波市学科带头人培育项目(G12-XK10)联合资助
摘 要:以浙江省为案例地,构建了基于PSR-EES模型的旅游生态安全评价指标体系,运用改进的TOPSIS法对其2000~2012年旅游生态安全进行了动态评估,并使用生态安全等级动态度模型、马尔可夫链模型、灰色关联度模型对其时空格局和障碍因子进行了分析。结果表明:1 2000~2012年,浙江省旅游生态安全指数由0.399增加至0.628,安全等级从敏感等级上升至一般安全等级;2浙江省旅游生态安全风险等级和敏感等级的城市数量减少,而临界安全和一般安全等级的城市数量增加,且旅游生态安全等级存在跳跃式转移;3浙江省旅游生态安全主要障碍因子为游客数量增长率、旅游收入增长率、环保投入占GDP比重和森林覆盖率。Scientifical assessment on the ecological security of tourist destinations is important for achieving the sustainable development of tourism. Based on the principles of systematicness, hierarchy, maneuverability and the procurability of research data, and the actual situation of tourism economy and ecological environment in Zhejiang Province, this article combines the Pressure-State-Response(P-S-R) model and the Economic-Environment-Social(EES) model to construct a tourism destination ecological security evaluation index system.The mean-square-error decision method was used to calculate the weight of the evaluation index. We used improved TOPSIS to conduct a dynamic evaluation index of the tourism destination ecological security in Zhejiang Province form 2000 to 2012. The spatio-temporal pattern and its obstacle factors were studied using ArcGIS software, dynamic model of ecological security level, the Markov chain model, and the gray relative level model. The results showed the following: 1) from 2000 to 2012, the tourism destination ecological security comprehensive index increased from 0.399 to 0.626, the security level raised from the sensitive grade to the general safety grade. In this period, there were a risk grade in 2000-2002 and 2004-2005; a sensitive grade in2006; a critical safety grade in 2003, 2007 and 2010; and a general safety grade in the other years. The tourism destination ecological security in Zhejiang Province still has a big space to promote. 2) In Zhejiang Province,the number of cities with risk grade and sensitive grade for ecological security decreased while that with a critical safety grade and general safety grade increased. Furthermore, the increase speed of the number of cities with the relatively high security grade is faster than the decrease speed of the number of cities with the relatively low security grade. There exists a leaping development among the transfer process of different ecological security grades. 3) The main factors affecting ecological security are the growth rate
分 类 号:X826[环境科学与工程—环境工程] F592.7[经济管理—旅游管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28