检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:礼青[1] 林红伍[1] 王枢传[1] 王玉珍[2]
机构地区:[1]天津市第一中心医院,300011 [2]天津市胸科医院
出 处:《上海医学》2002年第9期552-554,共3页Shanghai Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 观察和比较氧驱动高剂量异丙托品雾化吸入对慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD)急性恶化的疗效和安全性。方法 3 2例住院COPD急性恶化患者随机均分为对照组 (异丙托品常规剂量吸入 ,每次吸入剂量 40μg ,每日 3次 )和治疗组 (高剂量异丙托品雾化吸入 ,每次吸入剂量 5 0 0 μg ,每日 3次 )。记录治疗前和治疗后0 .2 5、0 .5、1、2、4、6h和 1周时的肺功能、动脉血压、症状和用药反应 ,统计两组恶化持续天数。结果 两组在治疗后 0 .2 5、0 .5、1、2、4、6h一秒钟用力呼气量 (FEV1 )均显著升高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,治疗组治疗后 0 .2 5hFEV1 为1.2 7L ,0 .5h为 1.40L ,1h为 1.3 8L ,2h为 1.3 0L ,6h为 0 .2 5L ,对照组相应为 1.17、1.2 2、1.2 8、1.2 3、1.16和 1.14L。用药后治疗组 0 .2 5、0 .5、1、2、4及 6h的FEV1 值增高均大于对照组 (P <0 .0 5 )。此外 ,两组用药 1周后 ,肺功能和动脉血气均明显改善 ,但治疗组较对照组更明显 (P <0 .0 5 )。治疗组平均恶化持续天数和住院天数均较短 ,分别为 10 .5d和 11.4d ;对照组较长 ,分别为 15 .7d和 16.4d ,两组用药后的不良反应均少而轻微 ,且差异无显著性。结论 氧驱动高剂量异丙托品雾化吸入治疗COPD急性恶化较常规剂量吸入异丙托品效果更显著 ,其扩张气道明显 ,Objective To determine and compare the efficacy and safety of high dose nebuliged ipratropium driven by oxygen in patients with exacerbation of COPD. Methods 32 cases with acute exacerbation of COPD admitted to our medical ward were ramdomly assigned to control group (ipratropium delivered via MDIs, n =16, 40 μg, 3 times a day)and treatment group(ipratropium nebuliged with oxygen, n =16, 500 μg, 3 times a day).Pulmonary function test, blood gas analysis, symptoms and responses to the medication were performed and recorded as baseline before treatment and at 0.25,0.5,1,2,4,6 h and one week after treatment. The hospital days and the days of persistent exacerbation of individuals in both groups were recorded. Results FEV 1(L) at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after treatment increased significantly( P <0.05), but more significantly improved in the treatment group than in the control group( P <0.05). In addition, pulmonary function and arterial blood gases were improved significantly in both groups after a week of administration but in the treatment group the improvement was more obvious( P <0.05), the average exacerbation lasting days and hospitalization days were shorter (10.5 days and 11.4 days respectively), yet in the control group they were 15.7 and 16.4 days respectively. Side effects were few and mild in both groups and they were not obviously different. Conclusion Compare to the routine dose inhalation, oxygen driving high dose ipratropium by aerosol inhalation is more effective and obvious with stronger bronchodilalation, more persistent and no added adverse effects on acute exacerbation of COPD, particularly good for the patients with severe airway obstruction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113