整体式塑料排水板与普通塑料排水板加固效果对比试验  被引量:13

Comparative tests on reinforcement effects of integral and ordinary plastic drainage boards

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘爱民[1,2,3] 梁爱华[1,2,3] 尹长权 

机构地区:[1]中交天津港湾工程研究院有限公司,天津300222 [2]港口岩土工程技术交通行业重点实验室,天津300222 [3]天津市港口岩土工程技术重点实验室,天津300222

出  处:《岩土工程学报》2016年第S1期130-133,共4页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

摘  要:目前对于新吹填的淤泥和流泥等超软土地基,一般认为采用防淤堵的整体式塑料排水板比采用普通塑料排水板加固效果更加理想;而对于新吹填的黏土和粉质黏土等土性较好的软土地基,现场试验对比结果表明,采用整体式塑料排水板和普通塑料排水板加固效果相近,也就是说整体式塑料排水板的优势并不明显。At present, for the soft soil ground such as newly reclaimed silt and mud flows, it is generally considered that the integral plastic drainage board with anti-clogging reinforced effect is more desirable than the ordinary plastic drainage board; while for the soft soil ground such as newly reclaimed clay and silty clay, the comparative field test results show that the integral plastic drainage board and the general plastic drainage board have similar reinforced effects, that is to say the advantages of the integral plastic drainage board is not obvious.

关 键 词:整体式塑料排水板 滤膜 加固效果 真空压力 

分 类 号:TU472.33[建筑科学—结构工程] TU531.7[建筑科学—土工工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象