合理利用SCI对个人做学术评价  

Rational Use of Science Citation Index for Evaluating the Academic Performance of an Individual

作　　者：孙亦樑[1] 徐克敏[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学化学与分子工程学院 [2]北京大学信息管理系,北京海淀100871

出　　处：《图书馆论坛》2002年第5期24-26,53,共4页Library Tribune

摘　　要：对个人进行学术评价时 ,《科学引文索引》提供该作者的论文数目 ,刊登论文的期刊影响因子 ,以及论文发表后被引次数等各种信息。本文作者认为三者虽说都应考虑 ,但后二者尤为重要。同时这些统计数字非神圣不可侵犯。因为学科之间千差万别 ,缺乏互比性 ,有些成果开创性强 ,来之不易 ,但被引次数反而不如沿着前人指引方向获得的后续成果。因此 ,同行评议还是需要的。Among the various data provided by Science Citation Index which are useful for evaluating the academic performance of an individual,i.e.the number of documents embodied in the database,impact factor of the periodicals in which the documents were published as well as the times cited for documents,the last two seem to be more important than the first one.However,these valuable data are still insufficient to evaluate the academic performance of an individual.There is little comparability among scientific papers in different disciplines,It is not unusual to find that a paper appearing earlier with high originality receives less citation while some others following later with less originality receive yet more citations.Thus,peers review is still necessary to make more reliable evaluation.

关 键 词：《科学引文索引》 同行评议 学术评价 SCI 被引次数 影响因子 

分 类 号：G353.2[文化科学—情报学]