检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《重庆大学学报(自然科学版)》2002年第9期134-138,共5页Journal of Chongqing University
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目 (70 0 710 3 6)
摘 要:随着中国电力工业市场化改革进程的加快 ,如何制定上网电价已成为电厂竞价上网过程中的一个关键性问题。为此阐述了两种电力定价模式———会计学定价模式和经济学定价模式 ,并依次分析了还本付息电价、经营期电价及边际成本电价等 3种电价测算方法的成本构成、计算原理 ;最后通过具体算例 ,对转轨期间我国并存的上述 3种测算方法进行了比较 ,通过比较可以得出以下结论 :即经营期电价法虽然摒弃了还本付息电价法的一些弊端 ,但仍旧很难实现经济学的最优均衡 ,据此认为我国现阶段电价改革的思路理应是 :明确改革还本付息电价 ,推广经营期电价 。With the reform toward power market processing, how to decide electricity price becomes a key problem which one power plant have to face. So in this paper, the authors show two ways to the problem, a pricing model by account and a pricing model by economics, then they analyze the cost structure and counting principle of three-electricity price, which is determined by the methods of repayment of capital with interest (RCI pricing), of the operation period (OP pricing) and of marginal cost (MC pricing). Then similarities and differences among these three pricing methods existing in the transitional period are examined by a case in china. The indicate that it is important and inevitable to reform RCI pricing, to popularize OP pricing and to transfer to MC pricing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7