检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳医学院附属第二医院急诊科,辽宁沈阳110002 [2]中国医科大学第一临床学院急诊科
出 处:《沈阳医学院学报》2002年第4期224-226,共3页Journal of Shenyang Medical College
摘 要:目的 :探讨预防静脉留置针在使用过程中引起静脉炎的有效方法。方法 :从2 0 0 1年 4月~ 2 0 0 1年 9月急诊科收治的患者中随机抽取 1 48例 ,分成两组 ,即实验组 84例 ,对照组 6 4例 ,分别应用常规操作方法和实验操作方法进行输液处置 ,观察静脉炎的发生率。结果 :将实验数据进行统计学分析 ,得出两种操作方法在引起静脉炎发生率上差异有显著性。两组患者的年龄、应用药物及留置针的型号、种类等差异均无显著性。结论Objective: To explore effective method of provention of vein inflammation produced by retained needle. Methods: The patients in emergency care unit were divided into two groups randomly, as experimental group and reference group. One was done with routine operation method and the other with improved method and nurse care to observe the ratio of vein inflammation. Results: Statistic analysis was used in the experiment date. There was a significant difference between two groups. There was no obvious difference between the patient’s age, operation part ,medicine, and the type and kind of the retained needle in vein. Conclusion: The improved method can obviously decrease the incidence of vein inflammation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3