美国版权投机问题及其制度诱因——兼论对我国的反面启示  

On copyright troll in U.S. and its institutional inducement: Also on its negative lesson for China

作　　者：周莹[1] ZHOU Ying(Law School, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学法学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期40-46,共7页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"知识产权导向下的文化产业创造力激励制度研究"(13AFX022)

摘　　要：近年在美国兴起的版权投机现象使版权维权诉讼成为一种挟持手段和商业模式。美国版权法中的法定赔偿规则是其最主要制度诱因,并与其他规则结合在一起,为版权投机的出现创造了便利条件。我国2014年《著作权法(修订草案送审稿)》在法定赔偿等方面的新规定,极易构成版权投机在我国滋生的制度诱因。因此,建议利用当前我国著作权修法机会对其合理规制,避免重蹈美国立法与实践的覆辙,并充分发挥激励创造的著作权制度效用。Copyright troll which has grown rapidly in U.S. in recent years has made litigation become a business modeland a means of coercion. And the statutory compensation rule in American copyright law is the greatest institutionalinducement for copyright troll, which combines with other rules to create an ideal legal environment for the emergenceof copyright troll. The new rules of statutory damages in Copyright Law (Revised Draft) made in 2014 are very likely tobecome a potential breeding ground of copyright trolls in China. Therefore, the present essay suggests that we shouldmake use of this opportunity of amending Chinese copyright law to make rational stipulations, to avoid repeating themistakes in American legislation and practice, and to put the institutional effect on incentivizing creativity to full play.

关 键 词：版权投机 版权法 法定赔偿 创造 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]