安博诺对比厄贝沙坦治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压疗效观察  

Observation on the effect of coaprovel compared with irbesartan in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension

作　　者：姜阿利 Jiang Ali(Department of Internal Medicine,Kaifeng Air Separation Hospital of Mebo Burns Wounds and Ulcers 475002)

机构地区：[1]开封美宝烧伤疮疡空分医院内科,475002

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2016年第17期22-23,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

摘　　要：目的:对比观察安博诺(厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂)与厄贝沙坦治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的临床效果。方法:收治单纯收缩期高血压患者110例,随机平分为两组,观察组采用安博诺治疗,对照组采用厄贝沙坦治疗,连续治疗3个月后,评定两组患者的治疗有效率并行统计学对比。结果:经过3个月的连续治疗,观察组治疗总有效率92.7%,对照组78.2%,观察组优势明显(P<0.05)。结论:采用厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂安博诺治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压治疗有效率显著高于单用厄贝沙坦降压方案,不良反应少。Objective:To compare the effect of coaprovel and irbesartan in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolichypertension.Methods:110 patients with isolated systolic hypertension were selected.They were randomly divided into the twogroups on average.The observation group was treated with coaprovel,while the control group was treated with irbesartan therapy.After 3 months of continuous treatment,the treatment efficiency of the two groups was evaluated and made a statistical comparison.Results:After 3 months of continuous treatment,the total effective rate was 92.7% in the observation group and 78.2% in thecontrol group,and there was obvious advantages in the observation group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effective rate of irbesartan/hydrogen chlorine thiophene triazine compound preparation of coaprovel in the treatment ofelderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension was significantly higher than that of single irbesartan scheme,with less adversereaction.

关 键 词：单纯收缩期高血压 安博诺 厄贝沙坦 

分 类 号：R544.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]