检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫鹏[1] 王贝文 陈庆民[1] 曹沐阳 赵禹博 赵志勋[1] 赵兴旺[1] 王贵玉[1] 王锡山[2] Yan Peng;Wang Beiwen;Chen Qingmin;Cao Muyang;Zhao Yubo;Zhao Zhixun;Zhao Xingwang;Wang Guiyu;Wang Xishan(Department of colorectal cancer surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical University, Colorectal Cancer Institute of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China;Department of colorectal surgery, Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠肿瘤外科,150086 [2]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科,100021
出 处:《中华结直肠疾病电子杂志》2015年第6期627-632,共6页Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基 金:黑龙江省自然基金青年项目(QC2011C035)
摘 要:目的比较手助腹腔镜与全腹腔镜在外科治疗结直肠癌中的近期疗效,另外对手辅助腹腔镜外科治疗结直肠癌的安全性做出评估。方法选取2011年11月至2014年4月哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠肿瘤外科的79例结直肠癌患者,其中接受腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术者41例,接受手辅助腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术者38例。根据2种术式分为全腹腔镜组(LAC组)和手助腹腔镜组(HALS组)。通过回顾性分析,比较2组患者的一般资料包括年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、肿瘤病理类型、分期、ASA分级、BMI指数等;手术资料包括手术时间、麻醉时间、术中出血量、中转开腹率、取标本切口长度、Trocar数目等;术后资料包括术后第一次排气时间、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症情况等。结果 HALS组和LAC组两组手术时间、麻醉时间、术中出血量、Trocar使用数目、取标本切口长度、术后首次排气时间存在差异(P<0.05);术后住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论手辅助腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术与全腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术相比具有手术时间短、创伤小、术后恢复快等优点,是一种安全有效,可靠的技术。Objective To compare the recently clinical therapeutic effect of hand-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumors. In addition we evaluated the safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic in curing the colorectal tumors. Methods Retrospectively chose 79 patients with colorectal tumors from November 2011 to April 2014 in Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.The number of patients who received the abdominal laparoscopic colectomy is 41,the number of hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is 38. According two kinds of surgical procedures into abdominal laparoscopic group (LAC group) and hand-assisted laparoscopic group (HALS group). By retrospectively analysis, compared the general information of two groups of patients including age, sex, tumor location,tumor histological type, stage, ASA grade, BMI index; surgery information, including operative time,anesthesia time, blood lossing, laparotomy rate specimens incision length, trocar numbers, etc; postoperative data including exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, postoperative complications,etc. Results There has a difference between HALS group and LAC group in operative time, anesthesia time, blood lossing, Trocar used numbers, specimens incision length (P < 0.05). But the difference of postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization , postoperative complications have no significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions The result of comparing the two types of surgical procedures in colorectal tumors,hand-assisted laparoscopic and pure Abdominal laparoscopic, HALS have many advantages like the shorter operative time, less invasive, quick recovery, hand-assisted laparoscopic is a a safe, effective and reliable technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.192.220