检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘占青[1] 王建平[1] 帅勇[1] LIU Zhan-qing;WANG Jian-ping;SHUAI Yong(Department of Technical Support Engineering,Armored Force Engineering Academy,Beijing 100072,China)
机构地区:[1]装甲兵工程学院技术保障工程系,北京100072
出 处:《价值工程》2016年第33期231-233,共3页Value Engineering
摘 要:目前,装甲装备训练机构下属各专业单位,在基地级维修和中继级维修中,较多采用单独送修的方式,使得送修装备由于训练重点的不同而存在技术效能消耗不均衡的矛盾,这与"计划使用,均衡送修"的要求相悖。本文尝试以经济性原理为主线,分析装备交流使用后再进行基地级和中继级维修的计划维修模式的优势,为装甲装备训练机构提供送修决策参考。At present, the separate repair method is mainly used in the base-level maintenance and intermediate-level maintenance in specialized units that subordinated to armored equipment training institutions. This makes the focuses of repair equipment be different, and the consumption of technical efficiency is not balanced. So it is contrary to the demand of "Designed Use and Balanced Repair". This paper attempts to use the principle of economic analysis as the main line, analyzes the advantages of the planned maintenance modes of base-level maintenance and intermediate-level maintenance that after the exchange and use to provide reference for the repair decisions of armored equipment training institutions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69