检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩宇洲[1] 郜恋恋 王静[1] 陈雪[1] HAN Yuzhou;GAO Lianlian;WANG Jing;CHEN Xue(Central Hospital of China National Petroleum Corporation, Langfang, Hebei, 065000)
机构地区:[1]中国石油天然气集团公司中心医院,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2016年第2期17-19,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨护理干预对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者血糖控制及妊娠结局的影响。方法随机选取2014年2月—2015年10月本院收治的110例妊娠期糖尿病患者临床资料,根据随机数字法将110例患者分成对照组与观察组各55例。对照组应用常规护理,观察组应用整体护理干预,比较2组患者血糖控制情况和妊娠结局。结果观察组血糖始终控制在正常范围内,观察组血糖控制情况显著优于对照组;观察组剖宫产、妊娠期高血压疾病、新生儿窒息、巨大儿、羊水过多等不良妊娠结局显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论妊娠期糖尿病患者应用临床护理干预,可以使患者将血糖控制在正常范围内,有效降低不良妊娠结局。Objective To explore effect of nursing intervention on glucose control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes. Methods Clinical materials of 110 patients withgestational diabetes were selected from February 2014 to December 2015. According to a random digital method, the 110 patients were divided into control group and observation group, 55 cases in each group. Control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given holistic nursing interventions. Glucose control and pregnancy outcomes were compared between two groups. ResultsThe blood glucose was controlled in the normal range in the observation group, and blood glucose control was significantly better than the control group. Adverse pregnant outcomes such as rate of cesarean section, pregnancy - induced hypertension, neonatal asphyxia, great children, excessive amniotic fluid in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P < 0. 05 ) . ConclusionApplication of clinical nursing intervention for patients with gestational diabetes can control blood glucose in the normal range and reduce adverse pregnant outcomes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.212.163