论条约解释中的嗣后实践  

The Subsequent Practice in Treaty Interpretation

作　　者：韩燕煦[1] Han Yanxu

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院

出　　处：《国际法研究》2014年第1期49-58,共10页Chinese Review of International Law

摘　　要：1969年《维也纳条约法公约》第31条规定了条约解释中的"嗣后实践"方法。本文通过考察国际司法机构、国际组织以及条约缔约国运用该方法的相关案例和实践,对嗣后实践的主体、内容和形式、构成条件等问题进行研究,并探讨了嗣后实践方法的法理基础,对该方法在条约解释中的作用进行了评价。Article 31 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties used the name of “ subsequent practice^ for the first time and listed it as one of the methods which should be taken into account when interpreting treaties. In spite of the provision and practices compiled by states, international judicial bodies and international organizations, there have been many controvesies on the subjects, the contents, and the elements of subsequent practice for years. The author tries to answer these questions by investigating and analyzing the practice concerned and assess the role of subsequent practice in treaty interpretation.

关 键 词：条约解释 嗣后实践 《维也纳条约法公约》 

分 类 号：D993.8[政治法律—国际法学]