“一带一路”通讯企业印度投资的标准必要专利风险防范——从爱立信诉小米案切入  

Prevention of infringement risk of Standard Essential Patents in terms of Chinese ICT enterprises investing in India with the background of OBOR:A case study of Ericsson vs Xiaomi

作　　者：刘益灯[1] 朱志东[1] LIU Yideng;ZHU Zhidong(School of Law, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期30-35,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"药品消费者保护中的国际私法问题研究"(14BFX033)

摘　　要：通讯企业投资印度对于共建"一带一路"特别是"海上丝绸之路"具有重要作用。欧美传统专利巨头利用其标准必要专利上的绝对优势对我国企业滥用侵权诉讼。印度高等法院裁判小米侵犯爱丽信标准必要专利不但阻碍小米在印度的投资计划,更影响同类企业在"一带一路"沿线其他国家投资拓展。基于此,试图借助小米案分析并论证如何通过投资前期的专利预警和布局,选择合理的诉讼策略,寻求印度当地反垄断救济措施以及促进印度履行国际条约应有义务的方式化解侵权风险,以期为企业对"一带一路"沿线其他国家同类投资的风险应对提供借鉴。It is crucial to OBOR construction for ICT enterprises to invest in India, especially to the construction ofmaritime Silk Road. Traditional patent giants from Europe and America make use of their superiority and launch aseries of Standard Essential Patents lawsuits against Chinese enterprises. Indian High court made the verdict thatXiaomi had infringed Ericsson, which not only hindered Xiaomi’s investment plan in India, but also had bad impact onenterprises of the similar type in investing in other countries along the OBOR. Based on this, the present essay attemptsto analyze the case of Xiaomi and testify how to deal with the risks through the alert and layout of patents, to choosereasonable litigation strategy, to seek anti-monopoly relief measures in local India, and to promote Indian governmentto fulfill the obligations of international treaties, in the hope of providing references for enterprises to deal with similarrisks in investing in other nations along the OBOR.

关 键 词：一带一路 印度 海外投资 标准必要专利 侵权风险 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]