罗氏痛经方配合耳穴压丸治疗气滞血瘀型痛经的临床观察  

Clinical efficacy of Luo's algomenorrhea prescription plus auricular point pressing therapy on primary dysmenorrhea of the Qizhi Xueyu type

作　　者：刘耀岽[1] 苏丽嬛 裴国清[1] 王芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]肇庆医学高等专科学校附属医院,广东肇庆526020

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2016年第31期63-64,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

基　　金：肇庆市科技创新项目;项目编号:2014E253

摘　　要：目的:观察罗氏痛经方配合耳穴压丸治疗气滞血瘀型痛经的临床疗效。方法:将75例原发性痛经患者随机分为治疗组Ⅰ(25例,罗氏痛经方配合耳穴压丸治疗),治疗组Ⅱ(25例,罗氏痛经方治疗)和对照组(25例)。观察三组患者的疗效。结果:两个治疗组临床疗效及中医证候疗效优于对照组,比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);两个治疗组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),但结果提示治疗组Ⅰ的临床疗效及中医证候疗效优于治疗组Ⅱ。结论:罗氏痛经方配合耳穴压丸治疗气滞血瘀型原发性痛经有较好的临床疗效。Objective: To observe clinical efficacy of Luo’s algomenorrhea prescription plus auricular point pressing therapy onprimary dysmenorrhea of the Qizhi Xueyu type. Methods: 75 patients were divided into 3 groups, 25 cases for each. The treatment I groupwas given Luo’s algomenorrhea prescription plus auricular point pressing therapy; the treatment Ⅱ group was given Luo’s algomenorrheaprescription; and the control group was established to compared with others. Efficiency in 3 groups were compared. Results: Clinicalefficacy and TCM syndromes in two treatment groups were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Clinical efficacy and TCMsyndromes in the treatment Ⅰ group were better than those in the treatment Ⅱ group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: Luo’s algomenorrhea prescription plus auricular point pressing therapy on primary dysmenorrhea of the Qizhi Xueyutype shows a good effect.

关 键 词：罗氏痛经方 耳穴压丸 气滞血瘀型 原发性痛经 疗效 

分 类 号：R271.113[医药卫生—中医妇科学]