论商家“最终解释权”法律制度的完善  

A Study on the Improving the Legal System Concerning the Right of Final Interpretation of Business

作　　者：胡家强[1] 赵雪梅[1] Hu Jiaqiang;Zhao Xuemei(School of Law and Political Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100,China)

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学法政学院,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期92-96,共5页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东社科规划项目"预付费交易法律规制研究"(13CFXJ09)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：商家"最终解释权"是一种附带性义务的权利。经成本—收益权衡比较可知,"最终解释权"归商家所有,其收益大于成本,只要商家合理行使、认真履行附带性义务、不违背有效性标准,商家"最终解释权"条款就是有益的。目前法律法规对商家"最终解释权"规制与引导的规定缺失,为此应在《合同法》《消费者权益保护法》以及《关于处理侵害消费者权益行为的若干规定》中通过增设或修改相关条款的方式对其加以完善。The final interpretation is a right with incidental obligations. By the cost-benefit comparison,a conclusion is drawn that businesses obtain the rights of final interpretation, and their benefits faroutweigh the costs. As long as businesses exercise rights and fulfill incidental obligations without prejudice to the validity, the rights of final interpretation are helpful. Currently, we are short of laws and regulations to rule and guide the rights of final interpretation of business. Therefore, it is necessary to improve legislation through adding or modifying relevant clauses in Contract Law? Consumer's Interest Protection Law, and Regulations on Handling Behaviors against the Interests of Consumers

关 键 词：“最终解释权” 附带性义务 经济分析方法 立法完善 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]