延续护理对糖尿病周围神经病变病人医院社区一体化干预效果的影响  

Influence of continuity of care on intervention effect of hospital community integration for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

作　　者：韩云[1] 吴琰[1] 李小娜[1] 吴海莉[1] 崔茜[1] 路露[1] 叶新华[1] Han Yun;Wu Yan;Lt Xiaona(Affiliated Changzhou Second People?s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu 213003 China)

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院

出　　处：《护理研究（中旬版）》2016年第12期4383-4386,共4页Chinese Nursing Researsh

基　　金：2015年度南京医科大学科技发展基金项目;编号:2015NJMU174

摘　　要：[目的]探讨延续护理对糖尿病周围神经病变病人医院社区一体化干预效果的影响。[方法]将我院2015年1月—2015年7月收治的100例糖尿病周围神经病变病人随机分为两组,对照组采用常规护理,观察组在对照组的基础上采用延续护理模式,比较两组病人血糖、临床疗效及周围神经传导速度的变化。[结果]两组干预后空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖、糖化血红蛋白、总有效率及尺神经、正中神经、腓总神经传导速度比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]延续护理能够改善糖尿病周围神经病变病人的周围神经传导速度,减轻临床症状,提高治疗效果。Objective:To probe into the influence of continuity of care on intervention effect of hospital community integration for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy DPN. Methods: A total of 100 cases of with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were randomly divided into two groups in our hospital from January 2015 toJuly 2015. The patients in control group used routine care, the patients in observation group used continuity ofcare model on the basis of that in control group. The changes of blood glucose, clinical therapeutic effect and peripheralnerve conduction velocity were compared between both groups. Results:There were statistically significantd i fferences in fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2 h blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,total effectiverate and the ulnar nerve, median nerve, the total nerve conduction velocity after intervention between both groups(P <0. 05). Conclusion:Continuity of care could improve the peripheral nerve conduction velocity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients, reduce the clinical symptoms and improve the curative effect.

关 键 词：延续护理 糖尿病 周围神经病变 神经传导速度 血糖 

分 类 号：R473.58[医药卫生—护理学]