论京津冀地区制度协同发展的困境与思路  被引量:4

On the Dilemma in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Development and the Way of Thinking of That from the Angle of Institutional Coordination

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:魏丽华[1,2] WEI Li-hua(Hebei Committee Party School,Shijiazhuang,Hebei050016,China;The Graduate School of Central Committee Party School,Beijing100091,China)

机构地区:[1]河北省委党校,河北石家庄050016 [2]中央党校研究生院,北京市100091

出  处:《中国流通经济》2017年第3期88-95,共8页China Business and Market

基  金:2014年河北省社会科学基金项目"协同发展战略下培育京津冀新型战略性城市增长极研究"(HB14YJ005)

摘  要:根据制度经济学理论,有效的制度安排是改善生产力、提高要素配置效率的主要原因,制度设计的优劣以及协同性的高低在某种程度上决定着区域经济发展的质量。多年来,京津冀地区协同发展一直踌躇不前,其主要原因在于制度设计协同的滞后。尽管京津冀三地协同发展对各地均有好处,却因有效制度供给不足,个体利益与集体利益不能协同,博弈行为主体谈判地位不对等,传统制度设计的路径依赖固化既有利益格局,导致市场分割状态依旧,既无法实现资源和生产要素的最优配置,也无法充分发挥市场机制的作用,进而形成了集体行动难题。而要进一步推动三地合作进程,创造京津冀协同发展的良好制度环境,必须构建制度协同体系,强化制度设计体系中利益的协同性,强化制度供求结构的有效性与均衡性,强化政府在制度供给中权力行为的边界性。Under the perspective of institutional economics,the effective institutional arrangement is the important reasons for improving productivity and enhancing the efficiency of factor allocation. For a long time,we have not made great achievements in the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,and the main cause for that is the lagged behind coordination in institutional design. Though there are the common interests in the coordinated development in this region,there is still market segmentation because of the inefficient effective institutional supply,the not coordinated individual and collective interests,and the not matched negotiation position of different game behavior main bodies. And all of this will lead to“the dilemma of collective action”with the problem of the not optimized distribution of resources and factors of production,and the ineffective role of market mechanism. To deepen the cooperation in this region and create the sound institutional environment forthe coordinated development in this region,we should establish the institutional coordination system,strengthen the interests coordination in institutional design,strengthen the effectiveness and balance of institutional supply and demand structure,and strengthen the boundary of government power in institutional supply.

关 键 词:京津冀 制度协同 个体利益 协同利益 权力边界 

分 类 号:F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象