浅静脉留置针两种不同进针方法的效果比较  

Comparison of effects by 2 different needle insertion ways of superficial vein indwelling needle

作　　者：蔡惠青 CAI Huiqing(Haifeng County Pengpai Memorial Hospital, Shanwei 516400, China)

机构地区：[1]海丰县彭湃纪念医院,516400

出　　处：《中国现代药物应用》2017年第6期156-157,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application

摘　　要：目的观察两种不同浅静脉留置针进针方法的应用效果。方法 287例接受输液治疗的患者应用单双号法分为研究组144例和对照组143例。研究组患者留置浅静脉留置针时应用改良后的进针方法 ,对照组患者留置浅静脉留置针时应用改良前的进针方法 ,对比两组患者的一次性穿刺成功率、穿刺并发症发生率。结果研究组患者一次性穿刺成功率为97.22%,明显高于对照组患者的89.51%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的穿刺并发症发生率为2.08%,明显低于对照组患者的6.99%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论本院改良后的浅静脉留置针进针方法 ,一次性穿刺成功率高,痛苦小,并发症少,值得其他医院借鉴应用。Objective To observe application effects by2different needle insertion ways of superficial vein indwelling needle.Methods A total of287patients in transfusion therapy were divided even and oddnumbered method into research group with144cases and control group with143cases.The research group received modified needle insertion way of superficial vein indwelling needle,and the control group received conventional needle insertion way of superficial vein indwelling needle.Comparison was made on success rate of one-time puncture and incidence of puncture complications between the two groups.Results The research group had obviously higher success rate of one-time puncture as97.22%than89.51%in the control group,and their difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).The research group had much lower incidence of puncture complications as2.08%than6.99%in the control group,and their difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion Modified needle insertion way of superficial vein indwelling needle shows high success rate of onetime puncture,little pain and few complications.This method is worth referring and applying in other hospital.

关 键 词：浅静脉留置针 进针方法 一次性穿刺成功率 并发症 效果 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]