羁押必要性审查实证研究及完善构思——以某基层检察院刑事执行为视角  

An Empirical Study of Custody Necessity Review and Its Improvement——from the Perspective of Criminal Prosecution of a Local Procurators' Office

作　　者：赵红 薛芳 

机构地区：[1]武汉市汉阳区人民检察院,湖北武汉430051

出　　处：《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期79-84,共6页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：检察机关有权审查羁押的必要性,向办案机关提出建议解除或者变更强制措施,并对开展羁押必要性审查的整个过程进行法律监督,是刑诉法修改后对于检察权配置的优化与完善,是司法体制改革背景下适当减少监禁刑适用的新要求,也是强化对审前羁押措施的监督以及切实保障人权的客观需要。从羁押必要性审查制度的实践检视现状分析,我国立法尚未明确规定该制度的具体操作程序、标准、适用范围等,导致该制度在司法实践中因缺乏具体的操作规范而无章可循,从而迫切需要逐步完善我国羁押必要性审查制度程序规则和探索健全审查机制,以利于彰显司法人文关怀,维护社会公平正义。The procurators' offices have the right to review the necessity of custody,give advice to case handling organs either to remove or alter compulsory measures,and exercise legal supervision of the entire review process. This practice has optimized and improved the power allocation to procurators' offices since the modification of the criminal prosecution law,has met the new requirement of reducing custodial penalty under the background of judicial system reform,hasstrengthened supervision of pretrial custodial measures,desirable for the protection of human right. Analysis of this review system finds that legislation in China fails to specify procedures,criterions,and applicable scope. This shortage is likely to cause a messy situation and requires a procedure specification to be established. A sound review mechanism is needed to manifest judicial humanistic care and to maintain social fairness and justice.

关 键 词：羁押必要性审查 实践检视 立法检讨 完善构思 

分 类 号：D916.4[政治法律—法学]