检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈慈文 Chen Ciwen(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Zong Han hospital of Cixi City,Zhejiang Province 315301)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2017年第15期32-32,34,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨药物人流以及无痛人流对终止早期妊娠的效果。方法:收治行人流手术患者180例,随机分为药物人流组80例和无痛人流组100例。结果:无痛人流组流产成功率优于药物人流组(P<0.05);无痛人流组患者腹痛情况、不良反应以及患者满意程度均优于药物人流组(P<0.05)。结论:两种人流方法终止妊娠都有着良好的作用,但无痛人流效果更好,且患者腹痛程度较低、术后不良反应少。Objective:To investigate the effect of drug abortion and painless abortion on termination of early pregnancy.Methods:180cases whom accepted abortion surgery were selected.They were randomly divided into the drug abortion group with80cases and the painless abortion group with100cases.Results:The abortion rate of the painless abortion group was better than that of the drug abortion group(P<0.05).The abdominal pain,adverse reactions and patient satisfaction in the painless abortion group were better than those in the drug abortion group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both of the methods have a good effect on termination of pregnancy,but the effect of painless abortion is better,with lower abdominal pain and less adverse reaction.
分 类 号:R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7